Showing posts with label based on a book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label based on a book. Show all posts

Monday, November 22, 2010

127 Hours

Film: 127 Hours (2010)
Dir: Danny Boyle
Rating: **** out of 5 stars



Based on the true survival story of Aron Ralston, 127 Hours is a riveting, emotional film, just as we have come to expect from Danny Boyle. Based on Ralston’s aptly-named book, "Between a Rock and a Hard Place", the film tells the story not just of a near-death experience, but of a life-altering experience to which any regular person can relate.

The film opens with Ralston, portrayed by James Franco, heading into the Utah desert alone for a hike. He neglects to tell anyone where he is going, confident in his abilities as a lone canyoneer. He meets two female hikers (Kate Mara, Amber Tamblyn) but ultimately parts ways with them so he can continue his treacherous hike alone. While crossing a deep crevice in the terrain, Aron falls and his wrist is pinned to the wall by a boulder. Trapped miles from where anyone can help him, he spends the next 127 hours (roughly five days) trying to free himself before his food and water supply runs out. He battles hypothermia, dehydration, and a bit of madness along the way.

In real life, the story of Ralston’s grueling ordeal became a national sensation. There was no doubt that it would be turned into a movie eventually – though not necessarily a good one. Fortunately, Danny Boyle took an interest in making the film adaptation. Boyle and co-screenwriter Simon Beaufoy make the film more than just a heartwarming survival tale. This is the story of a man – faced with a certain death - reflecting on his life, his mistakes, and the loved ones he has neglected. The theme resembles Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire in that both suggest that fate has a plan for us all and that sometimes horrible things happen for good reasons.

Boyle also provides a unique, fast-paced look for Ralston’s story. The hyperactive pacing reflects Ralston’s ever-moving lifestyle as a modern-day adventurer. It is especially poignant when put in juxtaposition with footage from the world outside of Aron’s – businessmen flocking to the subways; sports fans celebrating a game; families enjoying the beach; etc. Then there is Aron – this seemingly invincible super-man, all alone, seeking the next big thrill. A.R. Rahman provides an energetic soundtrack, and cinematographers Enrique Chediak and Anthony Dod Mantle combine their talents into creating a gritty, claustrophobic (but never dull) atmosphere. They are not limited by the small confines of the crevice in which Aron is trapped. We see his predicament from every conceivable angle – even the view from his water bottle.

The person who really makes 127 Hours what it is, however, is James Franco. Turning in what is easily the best performance of his career thus far, Franco brings a perfect combination of intensity, charm, and a surprising yet comforting sense of humor to his portrayal of Ralston. He is not just some climber stuck under a rock – he is a complex young man with regrets and unfulfilled aspirations. He is a very intelligent engineer who utilizes everything he has learned in multiple attempts to escape the boulder. Franco does the real Ralston much justice. From the moment Aron becomes trapped, the camera does not stray, giving the audience a window into his every emotion – pain, desperation, helplessness, loneliness, remorse, hysteria, and even joy. Franco is completely convincing at all of them. An Oscar nomination is sure to be in his future.

The only downside of the movie is that, thematically and stylistically, it is a bit too much like Boyle’s last feature film, Slumdog Millionaire. Obviously it lacks the central love story and Bollywood musical numbers, but the messages are very similar. Still, Hours is a solid film, and it certainly lives up to the true story upon which it is based. Real survival stories are so easy to exploit and they can make a bad movie seem better than it actually is. That is not the case here, as Boyle and company have created a powerful film about a man, not just an incident. To know the details of Ralston’s survival story, you could simply read what happened in the newspaper; but 127 Hours allows you to take a glimpse inside the mind of man driven by a need for redemption and the sheer will to live.

Friday, November 05, 2010

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Film: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009)
Dir: Niels Arden Oplev
Rating: *** out of 5 stars



Not since Let the Right One In has a Swedish film gained so much attention States-side as The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Based on Stieg Larsson’s popular novel of the same name, the film is the first installment of the Millennium Trilogy, which also includes the sequels, The Girl Who Played with Fire and The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest. The first film is a pretty good murder mystery once it gets moving, but unfortunately it is exceeded by its own hype.

In the movie, disgraced journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) is asked by wealthy industrialist Henrik Vanger to investigate the unsolved disappearance of his teenage niece Harriet roughly 40 years ago. As Henrik nears the end of his life, he yearns to finally put an end to the mystery that has tormented him for four decades. Mikael agrees to take the case and moves into the Vanger family’s island home.

Meanwhile, an emotionally-scarred young hacker named Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace) tracks Mikael out of professional and personal interest. Her prying leads her to uncover clues in the Harriet Vanger case, so she joins Mikael in his investigation. Together they open the lid on some dark family history, and as they get closer to the truth, their own lives are put in danger.

The script, written by Nikolaj Arcel and Rasmus Heisterberg, is a bit slow at first. The film really picks up once the two lead characters get together and the investigation starts to get interesting. Prior to that, there is a lot of background story provided for Lisbeth, which occupies much of the first hour. Still, the visual history makes her that much more of an intriguing character study. She carries a lot of emotional baggage, and some of her traumatic experiences explain her interest in Harriet’s disappearance. One piece of her history that is underrepresented in the film is the titular dragon tattoo, which is shown once and never addressed again. Furthermore, Lisbeth is more a sidekick than a centerpiece of the story, so why is her tattoo so important that it made the title? I suspect the novel touched on its significance, but the movie does not, which is perplexing.

Once the exciting portion gets underway, Dragon Tattoo is a pretty effective who-dun-it thriller. There are many potential suspects, misleading clues, and disturbing motives. The story involves religious fanaticism, cult rituals, and Nazis – all wrapped up in a taut, realistic murder mystery. The ending is a bit abrupt and all-too-convenient, but it is seemingly only as such because of the planned sequels. As Lisbeth, Noomi Rapace has garnered a lot of attention and deservedly so, as she is quite good. Michael Nyqvist, on the other hand, has not been quite as noticed by American audiences but he is also very good in the film.

Of course there is already an American remake of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo in the works. Fortunately, that remake will have David Fincher at the helm, so there is a very real possibility that it will be better than the Oplev’s film. Frankly, the original Dragon Tattoo is overhyped. It is an enjoyable movie, but not nearly as brilliant as some self-proclaimed art house film buffs seem to think it is. I have only seen the first installment so far, but at this point, I am more interested in seeing Fincher’s re-boot than the two Swedish sequels.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Touching the Void

Film: Touching the Void (2003)
Dir: Kevin Macdonald
Rating: ***** out of 5 stars



True-life survival stories are always captivating. A lazy director could simply make a by-the-books documentary and still produce a tear-jerker. When Kevin Macdonald made Touching the Void, however, he constructed an amazing film using tense re-enactments, survivor interviews, and gorgeous cinematography. Prior to seeing this film, I knew the story of mountaineer Joe Simpson’s brush with death in the Andes, and it was interesting and inspiring. But this movie brings it to life with such intensity and emotion that it had me in tears within the first 25 minutes.

In 1985, two young British mountaineers Joe Simpson and Simon Yates dared to ascend the Siula Grande, a mountain in the Peruvian Andes that had never been successfully climbed. Amazingly, they make it 20,000+ feet up the mountain despite treacherous snow conditions. In a completely isolated part of Peru, thousands of feet up on a dangerous peak, the unthinkable happens – Joe breaks his leg. What follows is a series of unbelievable events as Simon risks his own life to save his friend, and Joe endures an unimaginable ordeal to stay alive. To say anything more would spoil 1.5 hours of beautiful, intense, heart-wrenching storytelling - and it’s all true.

Between interviews with the real Joe and Simon, there are replications of the events using actors and/or stuntmen. These scenes dominate the film, making it more of an action-drama than a traditional documentary. They are also the most realistic re-enactments I have ever seen. It feels like you are really there, watching the situation as it unfolds. These actors look like they are truly going through everything Joe and Simon did. The re-enactments are shot on a large mountain that easily doubles for Siula Grande. Many times, I found myself wondering, “How did they do that?!”at these amazing actors/stuntmen. It is very easy to forget this is not happening live.

Macdonald utilizes sound brilliantly to create tension and fear. Cracking ice, howling wind, and falling snow make it so the viewer can practically feel the frostbite. The music is also a huge part of why the film is so tense and occasionally horrifying. With hardly any dialogue, the music really carries the re-enactment portions of the film. The snowy landscapes and cinematography are breath-taking. We see everything from the epic span of the mountain to the tiniest details in the ice. I wish I could see Void in IMAX as it would be ideal for that medium.

Aside from the great filmmaking, this is just one fantastic story. It has so many amazing twists and turns that it’s hard to believe that it all really happened to someone. Not only is it your classic tale of survival against all odds, but it’s a moving story about friendship. What Simon did for his friend is courageous and few others would do the same. Furthermore, seeing the real Joe and Simon telling their story is great. They are both charismatic men with great personalities and they tell their story with complete honesty – even when it’s unflattering. The way Joe describes his ordeal is often so poetic and beautiful. I have not read his book on which this film is based, but having watched this, I have no doubt it must be a great read.

Touching the Void is a perfect transition between Kevin Macdonald’s early documentaries and his later narrative features (i.e., The Last King of Scotland) because it has the best aspects of each. This unique docu-drama style has the feel-good inspiration of a documentary with the thrills of a big-budget action flick. It grabs the viewer right from the start and its grip only gets tighter with each passing moment. Macdonald’s brilliant combination of two filmmaking styles, in addition to his solid skills as a director, has created an unforgettable testament to the power of friendship and to the strength of the human spirit.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Let Me In

Film: Let Me In (2010)
Dir: Matt Reeves
Rating: **** out of 5 stars



Check out my review of Let Me In at The Horror Channel:

http://www.xomba.com/let_me_review

Please comment and discuss!

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

The Social Network

Film: The Social Network (2010)
Dir: David Fincher
Rating: ****1/2 out of 5 stars



Ever since it was announced that David Fincher was making The Social Network, there have been skeptics who have basically dubbed it “Facebook: The Movie.” In reality, this is not a film about Facebook. It is a classic story about ambition, jealousy, and regret. The birth of the social networking site may be used as a template to tell this story, but the film’s themes are as old as time itself and will continue to find a captivated audience long after Facebook is forgotten.

In his early years at Harvard University, Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) was already launching networking websites by hacking into school databases. His antics made him so notorious on-campus that he was asked by elite Harvard athletes, the Winklevoss twins, to help with a Harvard-exclusive networking site. Believing he could make something better, Mark creates Facebook instead with help from his best friend, Eduardo (Andrew Garfield).

As the site becomes wildly popular and adds new schools, it draws the attention of Napster founder and playboy, Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake), who encourages Mark to move to California and live the high-life in Silicon Valley. In the process of becoming the world’s youngest billionaire and a geek-chic rockstar, Mark loses a few friends and becomes the target of multiple lawsuits, including one from the Winklevoss twins for intellectual property theft.

The Social Network does not set out to portray an idea-stealing jerk, nor an imperfect genius. The character, much like the truth, falls somewhere in-between. Mark is reminiscent of Charles Foster Kane of Citizen Kane - both ambitious men who seek fame and fortune, but it never makes them happy. Despite all their success, they cannot let go of a single detail from their past. Kane’s hang-up was his lost youth (“Rosebud…”), but for Mark it was a girl – Erica Albright. His drive to succeed is spurred by his attempts to get her back, or by his jealousy of other people who have what he never could. Also like in Kane, the film’s non-linear narrative is divided between young Mark’s rise to success and the lonely man he turns into (as shown during lawsuit depositions).

No doubt many viewers will get hung up on whether or not all the events and conversations in this movie really happened. The truth is, it does not matter – this film works just as well even if it was 100% fictional. Still, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is very good about being unbiased and not suggesting that anyone is lying or plagiarizing. For instance, the Winklevoss twins could have easily come across as douchey jocks, but the film goes out of its way to defend their honor. Even Mark, for all his flaws, is sympathetic and often regretful of his poor decisions. And even if the real Mark Zuckerberg is nothing like the one portrayed in this movie, so what? Who can fault Sorkin for creating a fascinating character study? A great, fake story beats a crappy, true one any day.

The entire cast of this movie is fantastic. Jesse Eisenberg proves his acting chops as Mark Zuckerberg. Gone is that awkward, funny guy from Zombieland. In addition to his sharp wit and brains, Mark is brutally honest and condescending, and Eisenberg disappears into the role. On the opposite end of the personality spectrum is Mark’s best friend Eduardo, portrayed by Andrew Garfield. After being quite impressed with Garfield’s performance here, I am far less worried about his casting as Spider-Man in the forthcoming reboot.

Armie Hammer is also very good in Social Network, playing both of the identical Winklehoss twins himself. Each of the brothers was so different in personality that you can tell them apart despite their identical faces. Justin Timberlake is pretty good, too, and his Lady MacBeth-esque character is a great aspect of the story.

The soundtrack is another important aspect that makes The Social Network what it is. The music, composed by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails, is exciting, tense, and haunting in all the right places. Not only does the soundtrack kick ass, but it is very appropriate to have this movie scored by an artist from the same generation as Facebook.

Just like Citizen Kane is still considered one of the greatest films ever made, The Social Network is a movie that transcends the time period in which it was made. The character types and themes are universal, and while Facebook may be an icon of this generation, the movie will always be relevant and engaging.